Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section Australasian section European section Latin American section North American section
home
login/register
current articles

contribute
information for authors
status/user profile
links/forums
about us

Original Research

Balancing safety and harm for older adults with dementia in rural emergency departments: healthcare professionals’ perspectives

Submitted: 14 June 2016
Revised: 13 October 2016
Accepted: 8 November 2016
Published: 9 February 2017

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Hunter KF, Parke B, Babb M, Forbes D, Strain L.

Kathleen HunterBelinda ParkeMaureen BabbDorothy ForbesLaurel Strain

Citation: Hunter KF, Parke B, Babb M, Forbes D, Strain L.  Balancing safety and harm for older adults with dementia in rural emergency departments: healthcare professionals’ perspectives. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2017; 17: 4055. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=4055 (Accessed 24 October 2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH4055

ABSTRACT

Introduction:  The emergency department (ED) is a potentially harmful environment for older adults with dementia, and rural EDs face unique challenges in providing care to this population. The purpose of this study was to understand safety and harm in rural ED transitional care for community dwelling older adults with dementia from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs).
Methods:  An interpretive, descriptive exploratory design from a social ecological perspective was used. Using purposive and snowball sampling, HCPs were recruited from two rural hospital EDs in two Canadian provinces. Data collection involved participant interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, transcripts coded, and themes identified using constant comparative analysis with thematic coding.
Results:  A total of 12 HCPs, seven from one province and five from the other, participated in the study. HCPs worked directly in the ED or consulted in the ED from hospital-based social work, rehabilitation and community liaison services. Three themes were identified: physical environment (space, design and equipment), work environment (pressure to perform) and practice environment (family, knowledge and processes). A conceptual model was developed to illustrate how HCPs worked to balance safety and harm for older patients with dementia within a milieu created by the overlapping and synergistically interacting environments.
Conclusions:  HCPs in rural EDs working at the interface of hospital and community constantly attempt to balance promoting safety and avoiding harm for older adults with dementia. Participants perceived safety broadly, understanding that the consequences of the milieu were created through an interaction between physical, work and practice environments. These consequences related to the physical, cognitive and emotional wellbeing of older adults with dementia and their caregivers. Within the practice environment, participants identified a ‘rural advantage’ that was tied to their knowledge of community and the people with dementia and their caregivers who sought care in the participating EDs. However, familiarity can be a double-edged sword and to minimize potential harm healthcare professionals must seek input from caregivers regarding altered functional status, and policies to change triage to include gerontological knowledge and create elder-friendly rural ED environments are needed.

Key words: aging, Canada, dementia, emergency medical services, frail older adults, qualitative research, rural health services, rural hospitals.

This abstract has been viewed 1654 times since 9-Feb-2017.

   
 

   CONTACT US | COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER | ADMIN ONLY